Supply Chain..saw!
Have you ever wondered why, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the shelves of your local store were suddenly empty of essentials like face masks, gloves, alcohol, and even toilet paper?
It wasn’t just panic buying. Beneath the surface of the consumer rush was a deeper problem affecting global supply chains, especially those tied to chemical production. But what caused these shortages, and why were some items affected more than others?
The root of the problem lies in the complex web of global chemical supply chains. These supply chains are responsible for producing everything from synthetic fibers for masks to alcohol in hand sanitizers. When COVID-19 hit, it exposed vulnerabilities in a system that, until then, had worked like a finely tuned machine. At the start of the pandemic, a surge in demand for personal protective equipment (shortly PPE) like masks and gloves strained the production capacity of key chemical manufacturers. Factories that produced polypropylene (a plastic used in masks) and nitrile (used in gloves) were overwhelmed. Imagine trying to suddenly triple the production of something, only to find out that raw materials and manufacturing equipment are in short supply.
This is not all. When lockdowns were introduced globally, many manufacturing plants either shut down entirely or scaled back operations. Some of these factories were located in China, where a significant portion of the world's PPE and raw materials for these items are produced. For example, China manufactures about 50% of the world’s masks, but when the virus first struck, the country had to prioritize its domestic needs, reducing exports of essential products. Even though China quickly ramped up production, there was a delay in getting those supplies to other countries. This created a bottleneck that rippled across the globe.
Face masks and gloves were not the only items in short supply. Hand sanitizers, which rely heavily on ethanol and isopropyl alcohol, also became scarce. During the pandemic, demand for these sanitizers skyrocketed, but the raw materials required to produce them were limited. The chemical supply chain for alcohol was hit hard because many of the ethanol plants were focused on producing fuel-grade ethanol, which wasn’t suitable for hand sanitizers. The redirection of ethanol production to meet sanitizer demand was not immediate and took time to balance, contributing to the shortages.
You might be asking, "What about toilet paper?" While toilet paper isn't directly related to chemical supply chains, the panic buying and logistical issues compounded the situation. Toilet paper is bulky and takes up significant storage space in warehouses and on delivery trucks. The supply chain for this product is lean by design, meaning that production and distribution are typically balanced to meet steady, predictable demand. When everyone started buying toilet paper at once, manufacturers simply couldn’t keep up. This wasn’t just an issue of production; it was also about logistics. Trucks that might have been transporting chemical supplies or other goods were suddenly repurposed to meet consumer demand for toilet paper, causing further strain on the supply chain.
Supply chains in the chemical industry are particularly complex because they often rely on a small number of suppliers for key ingredients. For instance, 80% of global drug ingredients, including those used in sanitizers and disinfectants, are sourced from a handful of countries, mainly China and India. When these supply lines are disrupted due to factory shutdowns, transportation issues, or increased demand, the ripple effects are felt across multiple industries.
Further complicating the situation was the transportation bottleneck. Ports were closed, and air travel was drastically reduced, limiting the movement of raw materials and finished goods. Ships were delayed, and planes that typically carried cargo were grounded. This slowed down the entire supply chain, causing delays that further exacerbated the shortages of essential goods.
Even after factories began reopening, the supply chains didn’t instantly return to normal. Manufacturing isn’t just about flipping a switch and restarting production. It takes time to source raw materials, bring back the workforce, and scale operations to meet increased demand. This lag time contributed to continued shortages even months into the pandemic.
But there’s more to the story. The pandemic also prompted a reevaluation of how chemical supply chains operate. Governments and companies alike began recognizing the risks of relying too heavily on a small number of global suppliers. This has led to discussions about reshoring production - bringing manufacturing back to domestic soil - or at least diversifying suppliers to reduce dependency on a single country or region. For example, the European Union is now investing in its own PPE and chemical production to prevent future shortages.
In conclusion, the shortage of face masks, gloves, alcohol, and toilet paper during the early stages of the pandemic was a perfect storm of disrupted supply chains, factory shutdowns, and skyrocketing demand. The chemical supply chain, in particular, was stretched to its limits, revealing vulnerabilities that many didn’t realize existed. However, this isn’t just a story of shortages. It’s a story of how a global crisis exposed the need for more resilient, diversified, and sustainable supply chains to prevent future disruptions. So, the next time you reach for a bottle of hand sanitizer or grab a pack of toilet paper, remember the complex journey these items took to reach your hands - and the lessons learned to ensure we don’t face shortages like this again.
In case you are interested to know more about our technology make sure to check out our Products
Visit our website or follow us on LinkedIn for more details, and feel free to reach out for consultations on how our solutions can fit your flow chemistry applications.